[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090706150634.04255209.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:06:34 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c between commit
0406ca6d8e849d9dd027c8cb6791448e81411aef ("perf_counter: Ignore the nmi
call frames in the x86-64 backtraces") from the tip tree and commit
245b2e70eabd797932adb263a65da0bab3711753 ("percpu: clean up percpu
variable definitions") from the percpu tree.
Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
index 36c3dc7,13bd6d6..0000000
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
@@@ -1559,9 -1559,8 +1559,9 @@@ void callchain_store(struct perf_callch
entry->ip[entry->nr++] = ip;
}
- static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_callchain_entry, irq_entry);
- static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_callchain_entry, nmi_entry);
+ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_callchain_entry, pmc_irq_entry);
+ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_callchain_entry, pmc_nmi_entry);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, in_nmi_frame);
static void
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists