[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A5199F8.2010809@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 08:30:16 +0200
From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud@...e.fr>
To: Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: extend pipe() to support NULL argument.
Changli Gao a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Albert ARIBAUD<albert.aribaud@...e.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> pipe doesn't support llseek.
>> I wasn't thinking of actively seeking a file position, but simply that reads
>> and writes were independent (and both variable) in size, thus even without
>> (l)seeking, each endpoint has an independent read (resp. write) position to
>> track what's been read from (resp.written into) it at any time, and such a
>> position is, IIUC, single for a given fd, making a fd (a struct file)
>> insufficient for representing a pipe.
>>
>> Amicalement,
>> --
>> Albert.
>>
> pipe doesn't refer to pos when reading or writing. Please refer to
> pipe_read() and pipe_write() for more detail.
Hmm. Then how does pipe avoid overwriting what it's already written at the
in endpoint, or reading twice the same data from the out endpoint?
Amicalement,
--
Albert.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists