linux-kernel - Re: [Patch v2] btrfs: use file_remove_suid() after i

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A51AAFB.1000601@oracle.com>
Date:	Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:42:51 +0800
From:	Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
To:	Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
	Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@...cle.com>,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>, Arjan <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@...aler.net>
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] btrfs: use file_remove_suid() after i_mutex is held

Hi Amerigo,

Amerigo Wang wrote:
> V1 -> V2:
> Move kmalloc() before mutex_lock(), suggested by Arjan.
> 
> file_remove_suid() should be called with i_mutex held,
> file_update_time() too. So move them after mutex_lock().
> 
> Plus, check the return value of kmalloc().
> 
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@...hat.com>
> Cc: Arjan <arjan@...radead.org>
> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
> Cc: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@...cle.com>
> Cc: Sven Wegener <sven.wegener@...aler.net>
> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...hat.com>
> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
> 
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> index 7c3cd24..09ef5d6 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> @@ -944,14 +944,17 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_file_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
>  	if (count == 0)
>  		goto out_nolock;
>  
> +	pages = kmalloc(nrptrs * sizeof(struct page *), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pages)
> +		goto out_nolock;
I guess you need to set err to -ENOMEM here so that the caller knows 
what's wrong. With your patch, this function just return 0(since 
num_written and err are both 0) with no error, and I guess it is worse 
than kernel BUG out when the NULL pages is used later.

Regards,
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/