linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #13726] fio sync read 4k block size 35% regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:09:20 +0800
From:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13726] fio sync read 4k block size 35% regression

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:06:42PM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 02:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13726
> > Subject		: fio sync read 4k block size 35% regression
> > Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
> > Date		: 2009-07-01 11:25 (6 days old)
> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=51daa88ebd8e0d437289f589af29d4b39379ea76
> > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/30/679
> > Handled-By	: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> Fengguang,
> 
> I'm still working on it now. The new testing against 2.6.31-rc2 is ongoing.
> fio sync/mmap read has new behavior. I did collect some data. But suddenly
> with new created data, the fio_sync_read_4k regression disappeared, while
> fio_mmap_read is still there. Originally, the testing and bisect were stable.
> Let me check what happens firstly.

OK, thank you for the update.

> Just update.
> 
> How did you test your new readahead patches before sending to LKML?

I run various workloads and check if the readahead traces are abnormal.
In this regression case, the readahead traces are in fact normal :)

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/