[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:55:42 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:49:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> interacting with commit 3beab0b42413e83a7907db7176b54c840fc75a81
> ("sys_sync(): fix 16% performance regression in ffsb create_4k test")
> from Linus' tree.
Where the fuck is that patch coming from? For one that's a horrible
patch subject and second I can't see it anywhere on -fsdevel. We
removed that bdflush wakeup for a reason, and if it causes problems
those need to be discussed and fixed properly instead of papering over
it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists