[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090707173948.GC6184@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 19:39:50 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ftrace: add tracepoint for timer
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 05:28:18PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Jul 2009, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> >> Changelog v1->v2:
> >> 1: Add jiffies info into timer
> >> 2: Combine debugobjects and trace as Thomas's suggestion
> >
> > I like it that way. Some minor nitpicks below.
> >
> >> +TRACE_EVENT(timer_expire,
> >> +
> >> + TP_PROTO(struct timer_list *timer),
> >> +
> >> + TP_ARGS(timer),
> >> +
> >> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> >> + __field( void *, timer )
> >> + __field( void *, function )
> >
> > Do we really need the function here? It does not change between
> > start and expiry.
> >
>
> Yeah, I'll fix.
>
> >> +TRACE_EVENT(timer_cancel,
> >> +
> >> + TP_PROTO(struct timer_list *timer),
> >> +
> >> + TP_ARGS(timer),
> >> +
> >> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> >> + __field( void *, timer )
> >> + __field( void *, function )
> >
> > Ditto.
> >
>
> Will fix.
>
> >> +
> >> +static inline void debug_and_trace_timer_expire(struct timer_list *timer)
> >
> > Technically not really necessary. The debug code does not care about
> > it.
> >
>
> Will fix.
>
> >> timer = list_first_entry(head, struct timer_list,entry);
> >> + debug_and_trace_timer_expire(timer);
> >> fn = timer->function;
> >> data = timer->data;
> >>
> >
> > Can you please add the tracepoint which was suggested by Anton (IIRC)
> > which allows us to measure the execution time of the callback function
> > ? There is no need to dereference timer in the expiry tracepoint, we
> > just store the pointer. So we can safely move the tracepoints just
> > around the function call.
> >
> > trace_timer_expire(timer);
> > fn(data);
> > trace_timer_callback_done(timer);
> >
> > Or whatever fancy name you come up with.
> >
>
> OK, I'll fix it base on your suggestion.
>
> trace_timer_expire/trace_timer_callback_done are already in Frederic' tree
> but with different name, see below URL:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124331396919301&w=2
>
> I'll modify those tracepoint's name to match ours.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Xiao
If you wish so, I can gather your patches with the one of Anton Blanchard
and send a pull request once it's acked.
Thanks,
Frederic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists