[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f1b08da0907071818l1bae3256s30de304ed5ba3fa9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 18:18:47 -0700
From: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...izon.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.30.1
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Gene Heskett<gene.heskett@...izon.net> wrote:
> Just a heads up on 2.6.30.1, from logwatch's email:
>
> --------------------- XNTPD Begin ------------------------
>
>
> Time Reset 47 times (total: 11.411157 s average: 0.242791 s)
>
> Total synchronizations 74 (hosts: 4)
>
> ---------------------- XNTPD End -------------------------
> 2.6.30 didn't, with a lot more uptime, appear to need near as much support
> from the pool.ntp.org folks.
I don't see anything in the 2.6.30.1 patch that would effect NTP. Do
you have any peerstats/clockstats data? What does ntpdc -c peers and
ntpdc -c kerninfo show?
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists