[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090708123244.GA22722@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 08:32:44 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 4/4] fs: tmpfs, ext2 use new truncate
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 02:22:50PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> OK fair enough. But I don't know if all those checks are
> realy appropriate. For example an IS_APPEND inode should
> be able to have its blocks trimmed off if a write fails.
It should. But I think that's a separate issue of what we're trying to
fix right now. So let's just do the method reshuffle now and then sort
out the checks later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists