[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A549C9B.4060702@lwfinger.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:18:19 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13319] Page allocation failures with b43 and p54usb
Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> Yup, if it's not too much trouble Larry, I'd appreciate if you gave it
> a spin before I apply the sucker. Note to regression trackers, I don't
> think this should go to -stable because it depends on other patches in
> mainline and there's an obvious workaround for the problem (disable
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON). Furthermore, it's very unlikely people will hit
> this on production configurations anyway.
Pekka,
I have been running the patch for ~24 hours with slub_debug=0 as a
boot option. So far, no problems. My workload has not involved as many
network operations as some times, but my memory has not fragmented.
The output of 'cat /proc/buddyinfo' is as follows:
Node 0, zone DMA 8 5 5 4 5 5 5
4 3 0 1
Node 0, zone DMA32 1804 1585 3007 36 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
As might be expected, the high-order fragments are gone, but the O(1)
pieces have not been depleted.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists