[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090708134114.GA24048@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:41:14 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, nauman@...gle.com, dpshah@...gle.com,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, mikew@...gle.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
paolo.valente@...more.it, ryov@...inux.co.jp,
fernando@....ntt.co.jp, s-uchida@...jp.nec.com, taka@...inux.co.jp,
guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com, jmoyer@...hat.com,
dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@...il.com,
m-ikeda@...jp.nec.com, jbaron@...hat.com, agk@...hat.com,
snitzer@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] IO scheduler based IO controller V6
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:26:21AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> [2009-07-02 16:01:32]:
>
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Here is the V6 of the IO controller patches generated on top of 2.6.31-rc1.
> >
> > Previous versions of the patches was posted here.
> >
> > (V1) http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/11/486
> > (V2) http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/5/275
> > (V3) http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/26/472
> > (V4) http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/8/580
> > (V5) http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/19/279
> >
> > This patchset is still work in progress but I want to keep on getting the
> > snapshot of my tree out at regular intervals to get the feedback hence V6.
> >
>
> Hi, Vivek,
>
> I was able to compile and boot a 2.6.31-rc1 kernel with this patchset.
> I have a request could you fold up all patches and make one
> consolidated patch available somewhere (makes it easier to test), may
> be a git tree?
>
Thanks for trying it out balbir. Ok, for ease of patching and testing, I
will also maintain a consolidated patch. For V6 you can download the patch
from here.
http://people.redhat.com/~vgoyal/io-controller/io-scheduler-based-io-controller-v6.patch
> I did some quick tests with some io benchmarks and found in a simple
> scenario that the scheduler worked as expected, except that it took
> very long. I'll investigate further and revert back.
Thanks. I will wait for details.
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists