linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 2/2] memory barrier: adding smp_mb__after

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090708181619.GC4650@jolsa.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jul 2009 20:16:19 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
	mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fbl@...hat.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
	htejun@...il.com, jarkao2@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
	davidel@...ilserver.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 2/2] memory barrier: adding smp_mb__after_lock

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:07:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:47:48 +0200
> 
> > great, I saw you Signed-off the 1/2 part.. could I leave it,
> > or do I need to resend as a single patch?
> 
> Could you formally resubmit things, regardless of whether
> they are kept split up or combined?  That will help me
> a lot.  Thanks.
> 
> I think things are settled down at this point and we can
> push these patches into the tree.

np, I'll send out shortly complete v6 then..

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/