[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0907081658260.22105-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:02:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Michael S. Zick" <lkml@...ethan.org>
cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Null Pointer BUG in uhci_hcd
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Michael S. Zick wrote:
> > Like I've been telling you all along, the hardware isn't working.
> >
>
> That sounds very fragile.
I'm not sure how to interpret that sentence. If you mean that your
system's hardware design isn't good, I agree. If you mean that the
kernel shouldn't produce a lot of output when faced with broken
hardware, that's not so clear. What else should it do (bearing in mind
that the kernel can't tell the hardware is broken)?
> > I suspect it's worse than a simple interrupt-routing mistake.
> >
>
> I would not object to your removing that one mistake - that is one less
> to contend with.
I didn't say there was an interrupt-routing mistake; I said it was
_worse_ than an interrupt-routing mistake.
> > > > > For more information enable CONFIG_USB_DEBUG and CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, then
> > > > > see what's sitting in the usb/uhci/* files in debugfs.
> > > > >
> > >
>
> Fours up-time - nothing written to dmesg since boot -
> Just the usual hard-lockup.
>
> Also - something in the combined fix/diagnostic patch
> disable any sensing of external usb events.
> So I couldn't very well poke devices at it. ;)
You should take out those BUG statements. If they ever trigger, they
will certainly lock up your system.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists