linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: block tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090708104159.2de0dc03.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jul 2009 10:41:59 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure

Hi Christoph,

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:55:42 -0400 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:49:08PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > interacting with commit 3beab0b42413e83a7907db7176b54c840fc75a81
> > ("sys_sync(): fix 16% performance regression in ffsb create_4k test")
> > from Linus' tree.
> 
> Where the fuck is that patch coming from?  For one that's a horrible
> patch subject and second I can't see it anywhere on -fsdevel.  We
> removed that bdflush wakeup for a reason, and if it causes problems
> those need to be discussed and fixed properly instead of papering over
> it.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/29/52

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped