linux-kernel - Re: Possible memory leak in request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1247034519.15903.3.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:28:39 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Possible memory leak in request_firmware()

On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:38 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> 2009/7/8 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 19:01 +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >
> > There is one more leak in this area which I couldn't figure out where it
> > should be freed:
> >
> > unreferenced object 0xc353e530 (size 512):
> >  comm "cat", pid 3130, jiffies 4294903232
> >  backtrace:
> >    [<c01e6f6a>] create_object+0xfa/0x250
> >    [<c01e753d>] kmemleak_alloc+0x5d/0x70
> >    [<c01e223d>] __kmalloc+0x10d/0x210
> >    [<c03b2d2f>] firmware_data_write+0x1df/0x270
> >    [<c024163a>] write+0x13a/0x1b0
> >    [<c01eae1c>] vfs_write+0x9c/0x190
> >    [<c01eafcd>] sys_write+0x3d/0x70
> >    [<c010319c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
> >    [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
> >
> > Any idea? It looks like this is the kmalloc() in fw_realloc_buffer()
> > (inlined in firmware_data_write).
> 
> I guess the leak is introduced in commit :
>              commit	6e03a201bbe8137487f340d26aa662110e324b20
>              firmware: speed up request_firmware(), v3
> 
> The attachment patch may fix the leak, please test and verify it.
> Thanks.

I think you need to stop it from clearing fw_priv->nr_pages too.
With that change, it looks correct. Thanks.

Acked-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@...el.com                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/