[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090709072113.GC7992@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:21:14 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: tridge@...ba.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Martin Steigerwald <Martin@...htvoll.de>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, john.lanza@...ux.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, corbet@....net,
jcm@...masters.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_VFAT_FS_DUALNAMES regressions
On Thu 2009-07-09 14:27:39, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> tridge@...ba.org writes:
>
> > Can you explain what standard you think should be applied to patent
> > workaround patches for them to be acceptable? I'd like to know if
> > there is the possibility of us finding some agreement in the future or
> > not.
>
> You are talking different thing than patch. Please stop it.
Uff, the patch is obviously trash -- takes working code, replaces it
with known broken code -- so some justification is neccessary.
Outside of U.S., the patch makes obviously no sense.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists