[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A553E36.8060006@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 09:47:50 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@...il.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] block: implement mixed merge of different failfast
requests
Hello,
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> @@ -1165,6 +1165,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>> const unsigned short prio = bio_prio(bio);
>> const int sync = bio_sync(bio);
>> const int unplug = bio_unplug(bio);
>> + const unsigned int ff = bio->bi_rw & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
>
> Perhaps a bio_fail_fast(bio)
> and also an blk_failfast(rq).
Me not being a big fan of those simple accessors, I want to avoid
adding those especially the use of bio ones are mostly confined to
block layer proper.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists