[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A55B5A9.2060705@panasas.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 12:17:29 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Niel Lambrechts <niel.lambrechts@...il.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] block: implement mixed merge of different failfast
requests
On 07/09/2009 03:47 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>> @@ -1165,6 +1165,7 @@ static int __make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
>>> const unsigned short prio = bio_prio(bio);
>>> const int sync = bio_sync(bio);
>>> const int unplug = bio_unplug(bio);
>>> + const unsigned int ff = bio->bi_rw & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK;
>> Perhaps a bio_fail_fast(bio)
>> and also an blk_failfast(rq).
>
> Me not being a big fan of those simple accessors, I want to avoid
> adding those especially the use of bio ones are mostly confined to
> block layer proper.
>
OK but at least take care of blk_noretry_request(), at the minimum
kill it, and use req->cmd_flags & REQ_FAILFAST_MASK everywhere.
> Thanks.
>
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists