[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ace41890907090347m1f337731rb09b90327664ed5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:47:18 +0100
From: Hin-Tak Leung <hintak.leung@...il.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Linux wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Przemyslaw Kulczycki <azrael@...ocom.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Gábor Stefanik <netrolller.3d@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: fix supported cards for rtl8187
2009/7/9 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>:
> Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
>>
>> if they are not labelled v1/v2/v3 as such, it may be more
>> useful/informative to change to
>>
>> [some variant of ] ... [(other variants are supported by the
>> rt2070/rt3070 modules)]
>>
>> instead of just adding [v2] to the end.
>
> I don't know about the box as I bought mine used on Ebay, but the
> label on the device clearly states that it is a WG111v2.
>
> Larry
>
>
But that's a Netgear WG111v2 ? We are talking about Linksys
WUSB54GC-EU and its v1/v2/v3 . I am just thinking that if it is for
informative purposes (for those who actually selectively build their
kernel modules), adding a bit more info, such as suggesting to use
rt73usb/rt2070/rt3070 modules, won't hurt.
Incidentally I like to know a bit more about this patch - presumably
Marcin has such a device? I am also a little curious, as this commit
should be accompanied by a corresponding update in another Kconfig
which supports the device? I am not trying to be picky, but for an
informative (non-code-changing) patch, it can be more informative.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists