[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6a2187b0907090512y275c931ax7f93411ba5c97c28@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:12:23 +0800
From: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Scott James Remnant <scott@...onical.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Randy Dunlap<randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> arch/x86/Kconfig says:
>
> choice
> depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> prompt "Memory split" if EMBEDDED
> default VMSPLIT_3G
> depends on X86_32
> ---help---
> Select the desired split between kernel and user memory.
>
> If the address range available to the kernel is less than the
> physical memory installed, the remaining memory will be available
> as "high memory". Accessing high memory is a little more costly
> than low memory, as it needs to be mapped into the kernel first.
> Note that increasing the kernel address space limits the range
> available to user programs, making the address space there
> tighter. Selecting anything other than the default 3G/1G split
> will also likely make your kernel incompatible with binary-only
> kernel modules.
Got it. Thanks for the pointer.
Jeff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists