[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090709161059.GA2909@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:10:59 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Joao Correia <joaomiguelcorreia@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Increase lockdep limits: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 10:02:36AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 00:39 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:36:04PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Looking at a lockdep dump hch gave me I can see that that is certainly
> > > possible, I see tons of very deep callchains.
> > >
> > > /me wonders if we're getting significantly deeper..
> >
> > Looking at /proc/lockdep, I'm curious..
> > Take a look at http://davej.fedorapeople.org/lockdep
> > scroll down to c12c0924
> >
> > What's up with all those old_style_spin_init's ?
>
> What kernel are you running?
.31rc2
> Does your lib/dma_debug.c:dma_debug_init()
> have spin_lock_init() in that HASH_SIZE loop?
it's doing it by hand..
717 for (i = 0; i < HASH_SIZE; ++i) {
718 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dma_entry_hash[i].list);
719 dma_entry_hash[i].lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
720 }
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists