[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A56373C.4050409@vlnb.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:30:20 +0400
From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
scst-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Rename REQ_COPY_USER to more descriptive REQ_HAS_TAIL_SPACE_FOR_PADDING
Jens Axboe, on 07/09/2009 10:17 PM wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09 2009, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>> Currently names of REQ_COPY_USER and __REQ_COPY_USER constants are confusing,
>> because they actually mean that the buffer for the corresponding requests
>> has space in the tail for padding in case of DMA padding restrictions.
>
> No, that's not what it means, the fact that there's padding room is a
> side effect of the map type. So I'd suggest adding a comment above that
> if {} in blk_rq_map_sg(), something that should have been there from the
> beginning.
Can you elaborate a bit more about what REQ_COPY_USER should mean, please?
As far as I can see from the sources, currently it's used to only to
determine if there is the padding space. Maybe, the original meaning
doesn't make sense anymore?
Thanks,
Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists