[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907091620470.16817@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [patch v2] slub: add option to disable higher order debugging
slabs
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > + * Debugging flags that require metadata to be stored in the slab, up to
> > + * DEBUG_SIZE in size.
> > + */
> > +#define DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS (SLAB_RED_ZONE | SLAB_POISON | SLAB_STORE_USER)
> > +#define DEBUG_SIZE (3 * sizeof(void *) + 2 * sizeof(struct track))
>
> There is no need for DEBUG_SIZE since slub keeps both the size of the
> object kmem_cache->objsize and the size with the metadata kmem_cache->size
>
> If the order of both is different then the order would increase.
>
Without DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, the only way to determine what flags have
increased the size is in calculate_sizes() and then disable them by
default if slub_debug=O is specified. calculate_sizes() is used by
the `store', `poison', and `red_zone' callbacks, so the admin still has
the ability to enable these options even though slub_debug=O was used.
So we can either mask off the size-increasing debug bits when the cache is
created in kmem_cache_flags() like I did, or we can move the logic to
calculate_sizes() with an added formal to determine whether this is from
kmem_cache_open() or one of the attribute callbacks.
I think my solution is the cleanest and provides a single entity,
DEBUG_SIZE_FLAGS, which specifies the flags that slub_debug=O clears if
the minimum order increases.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists