linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #13726] fio sync read 4k block size 35% regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1247211714.2560.546.camel@ymzhang>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:41:54 +0800
From:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13726] fio sync read 4k block size 35% regression

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 14:37 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 02:06:42PM +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 02:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > > (either way).
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13726
> > > Subject		: fio sync read 4k block size 35% regression
> > > Submitter	: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Date		: 2009-07-01 11:25 (6 days old)
> > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=51daa88ebd8e0d437289f589af29d4b39379ea76
> > > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/30/679
> > > Handled-By	: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> > Fengguang,
> > 
> > I'm still working on it now. The new testing against 2.6.31-rc2 is ongoing.
> > fio sync/mmap read has new behavior. I did collect some data. But suddenly
> > with new created data, the fio_sync_read_4k regression disappeared, while
> 
> Do you mean the fio_sync_read_4k regression disappeared because we are
> collecting data with lots of printks?
No. I recreated the data and the regression disappeared.

> 
> > fio_mmap_read is still there. Originally, the testing and bisect were stable.
> > Let me check what happens firstly.
> 
> Thanks! What's your fio_mmap_read job file and the readahead traces?
I dumped trace data of fio and found the sync read isn't really sequential. I
create many processes and every process could read a group of files. The trace
shows fio reads a record of a file, then switch to another file to read. My
original assumption is a process reads the complete file sequentially and then
read the 2nd file. Now I upgrade fio the latest version and add parameter
file_service_type=random:4000000 to rerun all testing.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/