[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247213373.2471.19.camel@ht.satnam>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:39:33 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/44] includecheck fix: x86, shadow.c
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 21:01 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner<tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > > Can we stop this kindergarden already? The patch is so obvious that it
> > > just should be applied. I'll pick up all x86 ones and fold them in.
> >
> > What kindergarten are you talking about? Technically Ingo "kicked"
> > kmemcheck out of the x86 tree so the patch should go through
> > kmemcheck.git which makes Cyrill's CC correction spot on.
>
> I'm referring to the fact that these changes are so obvious that we do
> neither need dozens separate commits nor the ack of everyone plus some
> more. My inbox is full enough already.
>
Hey kindergarten kid,
What the hell you are talking about, I did not send even one email to
you.
Hey kid here is your today's lesson:
If you and your inbox is upset with x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
emails then quit x86 maintainer-ship.
If you and your inbox is upset with LKML emails then quit LKML.
If you upset with life then ...
--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists