[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090710091337.GD23611@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:13:37 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Alan.Brunelle@...com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix blktrace unaligned memory access
On Fri, Jul 10 2009, Li Zefan wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that relay_reserve() (or the ring_buffer_event_data(), that one
> > still needs some love) can return unaligned memory, there's no way
> > around that when you have pdu lengths that aren't a nice size. This can
> > cause unaligned access warnings on platforms that care about alignment.
> >
>
> Seems relay_reserve() does nothing for alignment..On the other hand,
> ring_buffer_event_data() returns a ptr which is 32bit-aligned, but
> this still means it can cause unaligned accesses on 64bits arch, while
> I think it's fixable in ring buffer, it's certainly not an easy job.
Right, it's a bit nasty...
> > This is an RFC, perhaps we can fix this in some other way. This one takes
> > the simple approach, use an on-stack copy and memcpy() that to the
> > destination.
> >
>
> or get_unaligned() ?
put_unaligned(), you mean? The big question is then which is faster, using
put_unaligned() or doing the memcpy() of the structure...
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists