lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247234212.7529.40.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:56:52 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, andi@...stfloor.org, acme@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired
 how many spinlocks to schedstat

On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:50 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > I wonder if the lock_*() events should become independant from 
> > lockdep so that we don't need to always enable lockdep to get the 
> > lock events at the same time.
> > 
> > It could be a separate option.
> 
> They already should be to a large degree if CONFIG_LOCK_STAT is 
> enabled but CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is off. In theory :-)

Right, you don't need CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING in order to get the
tracepoints. Also, you can always boot with prove_locking=0 or runtime
disable it using: echo 0 > /sys/module/lockdep/parameters/prove_locking



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ