[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247234212.7529.40.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:56:52 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp, andi@...stfloor.org, acme@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Adding information of counts processes acquired
how many spinlocks to schedstat
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 15:50 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > I wonder if the lock_*() events should become independant from
> > lockdep so that we don't need to always enable lockdep to get the
> > lock events at the same time.
> >
> > It could be a separate option.
>
> They already should be to a large degree if CONFIG_LOCK_STAT is
> enabled but CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is off. In theory :-)
Right, you don't need CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING in order to get the
tracepoints. Also, you can always boot with prove_locking=0 or runtime
disable it using: echo 0 > /sys/module/lockdep/parameters/prove_locking
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists