[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A575202.40407@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 07:36:50 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
tony.luck@...el.com, Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reduce export symbol CRC table size on 64-bit archs
Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> Actually I meanwhile think that module-init-tools can easily detect the changed
> layout without any further kernel side adjustments: Since it is known that a
> CRC always is a 32-bit value, simply checking whether the so-far-used 64-bit
> value has more than 32 significant bits should suffice: If so, the new layout
> is being used (with the symbol name starting at offset 4), else the old one is
> in effect (name at offset 8). This ought to be a pretty trivial change to that
> code.
>
If we're changing module-init-tools, it seems changing the section name
would be cleaner anyway.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists