[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1247241066.7529.50.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:51:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, oleg@...hat.com,
mingo@...e.hu, tony.luck@...el.com, rth@...ddle.net,
geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT
On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 11:42 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:57:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra said:
>
> > +/*
> > + * Disable preemption until the scheduler is running.
> > + * Reset by start_kernel()->sched_init()->init_idle().
> > + */
> > +#define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT (1)
> > +
>
> I had to look at this for quite some time before it sank in that it wasn't
> a reset of a #define, or a reset of (1) (anybody else remember changing the
> value of '5' in a Fortran program?). Especially when stuck in with a bunch
> of cputimer defines. Would have taken even longer if I was looking in sched.h
> for something and not looking at this patch at the same time.
>
> Can we fix this comment to mention it's thread_info.preempt_count that
> needs the reset?
Something along the lines of the below?
---
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -502,7 +502,9 @@ struct task_cputime {
/*
* Disable preemption until the scheduler is running.
- * Reset by start_kernel()->sched_init()->init_idle().
+ *
+ * We reset this initial offset of init_thread_info.preempt_count in:
+ * start_kernel()->sched_init()->init_idle().
*/
#define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT (1)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists