[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200907101001.22122.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:01:21 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: David Härdeman <david@...deman.nu>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
"Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Winbond driver as PNP
On Friday 10 July 2009 01:55:27 am David Härdeman wrote:
> On Thu, July 9, 2009 23:38, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Here are two sample patches to show you what I was suggesting. These
> > apply on top of the two Winbond patches currently in -mm.
>
> Thanks, great service :)
>
> I'll test the patches as soon as I have time and access to the hardware.
>
> One question though, the resulting patch series (if AKPM merges these
> patches in addition to the existing ones and drops the patch adding
> .shutdown to acpi_driver) will be git bisect unfriendly.
>
> Should I roll two new patches instead to replace the three patches
> currently in -mm?
If you like the approach and it works, I would take the latter
approach (replace the three patches with two new ones -- e.g.,
add-pnp-shutdown-method and add-winbond-pnp-driver). I don't
think we have to worry about bisectability until they show up
in a git tree.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists