[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090709.170811.21077750.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: jolsa@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, mingo@...e.hu,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fbl@...hat.com, nhorman@...hat.com, htejun@...il.com,
jarkao2@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, davidel@...ilserver.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 2/2] memory barrier: adding smp_mb__after_lock
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:25:55 +0200
> Jiri Olsa a écrit :
>> Adding smp_mb__after_lock define to be used as a smp_mb call after
>> a lock.
>>
>> Making it nop for x86, since {read|write|spin}_lock() on x86 are
>> full memory barriers.
>>
>> wbr,
>> jirka
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Also applied, thanks everyone!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists