[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090710014623.GA4723@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:46:23 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] rename is_single_threaded(task) to
is_current_single_threaded(void)
On 07/09, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 11:28:47PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > (on top of rework-fix-is_single_threaded.patch)
> >
> > - is_single_threaded(task) is not safe unless task == current,
> > we can't use task->signal or task->mm.
> >
> > - it doesn't make sense unless task == current, the task can
> > fork right after the check.
> >
> > Rename it to is_current_single_threaded() and kill the argument.
>
> It would be more natural to put the current first, as in
> current_is_single_threaded(). That would also fit with the various
> other current_* helpers we have.
Agreed, re-sending.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists