[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1d488th6t.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:29:46 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: suresh.b.siddha@...el.com
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
"kvm\@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"garyhade\@us.ibm.com" <garyhade@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] enable x2APIC without interrupt remapping under KVM
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 17:17 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> writes:
>> > Among number of experiments you have tried in the past to fix this, have
>> > you tried the experiment of explicitly clearing the remoteIRR by
>> > changing the trigger mode to edge and then back to level.
>> >
>> > Is there a problem with this?
>>
>> The problem I had wasn't remoteIRR getting stuck, but the symptoms
>> were largely the same. I did try changing the trigger mode to edge
>> and back and that did not unstick the ioapic in all cases.
>>
>
> I did some experiments locally here yesterday and on my old ICH5 based
> system, I couldn't reset the remoteIRR by changing the trigger mode to
> edge and then back to level.
>
> However what worked was an explicit eoi to the io-apic using the
> respective vector.
>
> I guess we need to try both the things based on perhaps io-apic version
> etc.
In part the deep problems I ran into was something other than RemoteIRR.
If it was something as simple as the ioapic being in a documented state
I would have kept looking. At the very least the RemoteIRR bit was not
set in some of the cases I encountered.
> But what I am nervous about is, did you try both these things aswell and
> still saw stuck interrupts?
Yes. The work arounds were in the code so I tried them.
> I will cleanup my code and post it, so that we can try on different
> systems. If this still doesn't work on certain HW platforms, atleast our
> experiments of what works and what doesn't work and on what platforms
> will be documented on the web.
Sounds reasonable. My apologies for the long delayed reply. I want
to work on this but I have higher priorities.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists