[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200907101518.13894.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:18:13 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, oleg@...hat.com,
mingo@...e.hu, tony.luck@...el.com, rth@...ddle.net,
geert@...ux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT
On Friday 10 July 2009 06:57:56 am Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +#define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT (1)
If the parentheses are useful or necessary, I need to be
educated about why. They look like superfluous paranoia to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists