[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <507E529B48%linux@youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 00:09:26 +0100
From: Darren Salt <linux@...mustbejoking.demon.co.uk>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
Thiemo Nagel <thiemo.nagel@...tum.de>,
Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>,
debian-eeepc-devel@...ts.alioth.debian.org,
acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.31] rfkill: allow toggling soft state in sysfs again
I demand that Johannes Berg may or may not have written...
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 22:09 +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
>> I demand that Johannes Berg may or may not have written...
[snip]
>>> *shrug*, I don't like it, but whatever...
>> I do. It means that we have a nice simple text-based interface for use in
>> scripts (for now), and a binary interface which is better suited to the
>> likes of desktop applications.
> Indeed, and as long as you expect to only use soft toggle... problem is
> that you won't know whether it's soft-toggled or not while it's
> hard-blocked (off)!
Which is fine for eeepc-acpi-scripts and anything else which doesn't care
about hard-blocking because the hardware doesn't do that.
eeepc-acpi-scripts should eventually use your rfkill utility, though. (I
intend to make sure that it does so.)
[snip]
--
| Darren Salt | linux at youmustbejoking | nr. Ashington, | Doon
| using Debian GNU/Linux | or ds ,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| Kill all extremists!
A large dog will have a surprising effect on your life.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists