[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0907112027530.1525@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:28:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] staging/otus: Move a dereference below a NULL test
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:17:24AM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 07/11/2009 09:51 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > diff -u -p a/drivers/staging/otus/wwrap.c b/drivers/staging/otus/wwrap.c
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/otus/wwrap.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/otus/wwrap.c
> > > @@ -1016,12 +1016,13 @@ void kevent(struct work_struct *work)
> > > {
> > > struct usbdrv_private *macp =
> > > container_of(work, struct usbdrv_private, kevent);
> > > - zdev_t *dev = macp->device;
> > > + zdev_t *dev;
> > >
> > > if (macp == NULL)
> > > {
> > > return;
> > > }
> >
> > The test is rather useless here.
>
> Yes it is.
>
> Julia, if you just remove the NULL check, will that keep your scripts
> happy from noticing such a "problem"?
Yes. The trigger is the NULL test after the dereference.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists