[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090711193944.GA32330@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:39:44 -0700
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: roland@...hat.com, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oren Laadan <orenl@...columbia.edu>, serue@...ibm.com,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_SIGHAND
combination
Oleg Nesterov [oleg@...hat.com] wrote:
| On 07/01, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| >
| > Deny CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_SIGHAND combination.
| >
| > CLONE_PARENT was used to implement an older threading model. For consistency
| > with the CLONE_THREAD check in copy_pid_ns(), disable CLONE_PARENT and
| > CLONE_SIGHAND with CLONE_NEWPID, at least until the required semantics of
| > the pid namespaces are clear.
| >
| > Changelog[v2]:
| > [Eric Biederman] Disable CLONE_SIGHAND also ???
| >
| > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@...ibm.com>
| > Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
| > ---
| > kernel/pid_namespace.c | 2 +-
| > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
| >
| > Index: linux-mmotm/kernel/pid_namespace.c
| > ===================================================================
| > --- linux-mmotm.orig/kernel/pid_namespace.c 2009-06-30 23:01:09.000000000 -0700
| > +++ linux-mmotm/kernel/pid_namespace.c 2009-06-30 23:49:06.000000000 -0700
| > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ struct pid_namespace *copy_pid_ns(unsign
| > {
| > if (!(flags & CLONE_NEWPID))
| > return get_pid_ns(old_ns);
| > - if (flags & CLONE_THREAD)
| > + if (flags & (CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_PARENT|CLONE_SIGHAND))
| > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
|
| Still can't understand why CLONE_SIGHAND is forbidden...
|
| CLONE_SIGHAND doesn't mean we share the signal queue, so what is
| the reason?
I don't have a convincing reason. We could disable just the
CLONE_NEWPID|CLONE_PARENT combination till we have a need for it. We
talked about removing CLONE_PARENT but backed-off since some application
may be using it. Disabling specific combinations like this (CLONE_NEWPID is
relatively a new flag) could make it a little easier to remove CLONE_PARENT
in the future.
Sukadev
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists