linux-kernel - Re: [FIX REQUEST] x86: smp.h is totally confused about processor ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200907112036.23176.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:36:22 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
Cc:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [FIX REQUEST] x86: smp.h is totally confused about processor ID

On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 05:30:34 pm Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> In same structure it using int, unsigned and unsigned int cpu

I prefer unsigned int, but historically it's been very loose.  FWIW, I have no 
problems with a cleanup either way.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/