[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A5A46ED.7010907@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:26:21 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, thomas@...3r.de, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
jmorris@...ei.org, eparis@...isplace.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.31-rc2: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
On 07/12/2009 07:30 PM, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> static void selinux_write_opts(struct seq_file *m,
> 1012 struct security_mnt_opts *opts)
> 1013 {
> 1014 int i;
> 1015 char *prefix;
> 1016
> 1017 for (i = 0; i < opts->num_mnt_opts; i++) {
> 1018 char *has_comma;
> 1019
> 1020 if (opts->mnt_opts[i])
> 1021 has_comma = strchr(opts->mnt_opts[i], ',');
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> And that is a NULL pointer dereference - but we just checked for
> opts->mnt_opts[i] for not NULL.
Note, that there is not a NULL dereference. It dereferences 0x40 which
came in as %rdi. Looks like somebody assigned garbage in there.
Or a single bit mem error. Is memtest OK with this machine?
What warning tainted the kernel before this oops is still interesting...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists