[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A5A4AF2.40609@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 23:43:30 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC: npiggin@...e.de, akpm@...l.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
tmem-devel@....oracle.com, kurt.hackel@...cle.com,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, jeremy@...p.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
sunil.mushran@...cle.com, chris.mason@...cle.com,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, dave.mccracken@...cle.com,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] (Take 2): transcendent memory
("tmem") for Linux
On 07/12/2009 11:39 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>> Right, the transient uses of tmem when applied to disk objects
>> (swap/pagecache) are very similar to disk caches. Which is
>> why you can
>> get a very similar effect when caching your virtual disks;
>> this can be
>> done without any guest modification.
>>
>
> Write-through backing and virtual disk cacheing offer a
> similar effect, but it is far from the same.
>
Can you explain how it differs for the swap case? Maybe I don't
understand how tmem preswap works.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists