[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9df5fa10907120407p6b4f67dtf4d563155488188a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:07:19 +0600
From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86,APIC: Fix false positive section mismatch in numaq_32.c
Impact: Fix false positive warning.
The variable apic_numaq placed in noninit section references the
function wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi(), which is in __cpuinit
section. Thus causes a section mismatch warning. To avoid such
mismatch we mark apic_numaq as __refdata.
We were warned by following warning:
WARNING: arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o(.data+0x932c): Section mismatch in
reference from the variable apic_numaq to the function
.cpuinit.text:wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi()
The variable apic_numaq references
the function __cpuinit wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*driver, *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one, *_console,
---
Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
--- linus/arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c 2009-07-12 11:27:30.000000000 +0600
+++ rakib/arch/x86/kernel/apic/numaq_32.c 2009-07-12 11:28:21.000000000 +0600
@@ -493,7 +493,8 @@ static void numaq_setup_portio_remap(voi
(u_long) xquad_portio, (u_long) num_quads*XQUAD_PORTIO_QUAD);
}
-struct apic apic_numaq = {
+/* Use __refdata to keep false positive warning calm. */
+struct apic __refdata apic_numaq = {
.name = "NUMAQ",
.probe = probe_numaq,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists