[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090713100242.f09c044b.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:02:42 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 13 (staging/usbip)
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:34:43 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:25:11 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 08:59:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 18:05:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Changes since 20090710:
> > >
> > >
> > > drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_common.c: In function 'usbip_thread':
> > > drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_common.c:386: error: implicit declaration of function 'lock_kernel'
> > > drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_common.c:390: error: implicit declaration of function 'unlock_kernel'
> > >
> > > config attached.
> >
> > Odd, that code has not changed at all.
> >
> > Did we just loose the big kernel lock somehow?
>
> I dunno. Probably some header file cleanup thing. :(
>
> Looks like only linux/smp_lock.h #defines it, but a driver shouldn't
> need to #include that file IMHO.
Adding
#include <linux/smp_lock.h>
does fix the build error, but I don't like it.
---
~Randy
LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists