linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix congestion_wait() sync/async vs read/write confusion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:44:19 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix congestion_wait() sync/async vs read/write
	confusion

On Wed 08-07-09 15:12:38, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:47:03PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This one isn't great, we currently have broken congestion wait logic in
> > the kernel. 2.6.30 is impacted as well, so this patch should go to
> > stable too once it's in -git. I'll let this one simmer until tomorrow,
> > then ask Linus to pull it. The offending commit breaking this is
> > 1faa16d22877f4839bd433547d770c676d1d964c.
> > 
> > Meanwhile, it could potentially cause buffered writeout slowdowns in the
> > kernel. Perhaps the 2.6.30 regression in that area is caused by this?
> > Would be interesting if the submitter could test. I can't find the list,
> > CC'ing Rafael.
> 
> Even if this does slow down some workloads, the bug is not in using the
> correct flag ;) So, I'd ack this one.
> 
> Jan Kara was able to reproduce the tiobench 2.6.30 regression, so I've
> cc'd him and kept the patch below.
  Thanks for the patch Chris. I've remeasured tiobench with the 2.6.30 +
the fix but it didn't help (which is not too surprising as what I observe
is most likely CFQ related as there's no regression with NOOP scheduler).
  Just to recall:
    2.6.29 (CFQ)           Avg    StdDev
8   38.01 40.26 39.69 ->  39.32  0.955092
16  40.09 38.18 40.05 ->  39.44  0.891104

    2.6.30-rc8 (CFQ)
8   36.67 36.81 38.20 ->  37.23  0.69062
16  37.45 36.47 37.46 ->  37.13  0.464351

    2.6.30-rc8+fix (CFQ)
8   37.56 37.38 37.98 ->  37.64  0.251396
16  38.11 36.71 37.18 ->  37.33  0.581741

  So with the fix there's no statistically significant difference and we
are still below 2.6.29 results. I'm now going to retest with the WRITE_SYNC
changes reverted.

									Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/