[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A5C923B.9090109@panasas.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:12:11 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC: John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Make SCSI SG v4 driver enabled by default and remove
EXPERIMENTAL dependency, since udev depends on BSG.
On 07/14/2009 04:29 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 09:38 +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> On 07/13/2009 10:43 PM, John Stoffel wrote:
>>>>>>>> "John" == John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org> writes:
>>> Dammit, I messed up here sending this patch. I've just edited the
>>> subject line and re-sent it with a bit more description. I think this
>>> patch is perfectly good to go into 2.6.31 right now, esp since it's
>>> not changing code, just whether the code is turned on by default from
>>> now on.
>>>
>> I would like it if you'd also CC stable@...nel.org on this patch. As this
>> condition is already true for distros in the field.
>
> The stable tree is for bug *fixes*. Moving an option out from under
> experimental is basically an enhancement, even if it could be argued it
> should have been done long ago.
>
wouldn't you consider it a bug if a low-level plumbing like Udev is shipped
with hard dependency on it?
if Udev was part of Kconfig it would have a "depend" on bsg. But because
it's a different product it can only rely on defaults?
> James
>
>
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists