[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200907141645.48833.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:45:48 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: monstr@...str.eu
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LTP <ltp-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: access_ok macor
On Tuesday 14 July 2009, Michal Simek wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Look at
> http://developer.petalogix.com/git/gitweb.cgi?p=ltp-microblaze.git;a=commitdiff;h=45f4cd783ce8b94f1267bb87c0c46e8536f62eca
>
> There are three affected tests and my quick fixes which I am trying to solve now.
>
ok, I see.
> int move_addr_to_user(struct sockaddr *kaddr, int klen, void __user *uaddr,
> int __user *ulen)
> {
> int err;
> int len;
>
> err = get_user(len, ulen);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
So the code looks something like
"1: lw %1, %2, r0; \
addk %0, r0, r0; \
2: \
.section .fixup,\"ax\"; \
3: brid 2b; \
addik %0, r0, %3; \
.previous; \
.section ,\"a\"; \
.word 1b,3b; \
.previous;" \
Not much that can go wrong there. First of all, I'd check that the
code actually looks the same in the binary. I assume that the 'addik'
gets executed when the brid branches, right?
I would guess that some of the logic in do_page_fault might be
broken and does not actually call the fixup.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists