linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ondemand: Introduces stepped frequency increase

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090714145947.GA25171@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:59:47 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To:	Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ondemand: Introduces stepped frequency
	increase

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 04:44:57PM +0200, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:

> The same program on an Atom doesn't show the same effect. It seems
> that Atoms scale also the FSB frequency together with core frequency.

I believe that this is true of all current Intel mobile chipsets - the 
lowest P-state will also reduce the FSB.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/