[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0907141918380.10805@sister.anvils>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:24:54 +0100 (BST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] shmem: call set_page_dirty() with locked page
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Here set_page_dirty() can be moved into the page lock.
Indeed it can, but you've forgotten to mention why you think
that would be a good thing? All I can see is that it would
very very slightly increase the page's lock hold time, which
wouldn't be an improvement: what improvement are you making?
Hugh
>
> CC: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
> ---
> mm/shmem.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux.orig/mm/shmem.c
> +++ linux/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1630,8 +1630,8 @@ shmem_write_end(struct file *file, struc
> if (pos + copied > inode->i_size)
> i_size_write(inode, pos + copied);
>
> - unlock_page(page);
> set_page_dirty(page);
> + unlock_page(page);
> page_cache_release(page);
>
> return copied;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists