[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A5CFFD8.7020106@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:59:52 +0100
From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@...nline.de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] NOMMU: add support for Memory Protection Units (MPU)
David Howells wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> wrote:
>
>> Some architectures (like the Blackfin arch) implement some of the
>> "simpler" features that one would expect out of a MMU such as memory
>> protection. In our case, we actually get read/write/exec protection
>> down to the page boundary so processes can't stomp on each other let
>> alone the kernel. There is a performance decrease (which depends greatly
>> on the workload) however as the hardware/software interaction was not
>> optimized at design time.
>
> It occurs to me that I could probably test this on FRV by using the MMU in a
> limited way. How do you actually keep track of the protections applied? Do
> you have a single global page table that is managed by the mmap code on a
> per-VMA basis?
No page table, just three bitmaps (r/w/x), with one bit per page, per mm.
Bernd
--
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists