linux-kernel - Re: Possible Suspend to Ram bug?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0907151330180.813@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:31:12 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@...w.ca>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible Suspend to Ram bug?

On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote:

> I'll try with debian's 2.6.30 first. But there's a small issue with 
> that, .30 and .31 seem to have some performance regressions according to 
> sites like phoronix.

You know, there are lies, then horrible lies, then benchmarks, and 
benchmarks done wrong.

Just do your own measurements under your particular workload, and if you 
see any performance regression, just report it.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/