[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090715.124150.120992830.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: petkovbb@...glemail.com
Cc: bzolnier@...il.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ide-tape: misc stuff
From: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@...glemail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:43:50 +0200
> Well, the downside to that is whenever there's a bug report and I want
> the user to do a debug build and send me the output, I'll have to rehash
> that debug patch and send it to her/him, maybe teach her/him how to
> patch a kernel, build it and catch the output and send it my way before
> we do some real work. Having the change upstream makes it _a_ _lot_
> _more_ easier to do that and this is experience talking, we had several
> scenarious like that already.
Your PFX patch has no effect at all, it's just cleanup noise.
The other patch moves the debug mask from one place to another,
why can't the debug selections bet set properly as is?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists