[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907151326350.22582@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] page-allocator: Ensure that processes that have been
OOM killed exit the page allocator (resend)
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index f8902e7..5c98d02 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1547,6 +1547,14 @@ should_alloc_retry(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> return 0;
>
> + /* Do not loop if OOM-killed unless __GFP_NOFAIL is specified */
> + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE)) {
> + if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
> + WARN(1, "Potential infinite loop with __GFP_NOFAIL");
> + else
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> /*
> * In this implementation, order <= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER
> * means __GFP_NOFAIL, but that may not be true in other
>
This only works for GFP_ATOMIC since the next iteration of the page
allocator will (probably) fail reclaim and simply invoke the oom killer
again, which will notice current has TIF_MEMDIE set and choose to do
nothing, at which time the allocator simply loops again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists